- Correspondence
- Open access
- Published:
The epitope of the antibody used in the REAADS VWF activity assay is quaternary
Thrombosis Journal volume 23, Article number: 3 (2025)
Abstract
The REAADS VWF activity assay is often assumed to be specific for the A1 domain, the portion of VWF that binds platelet GPIbα. We tested this assay on the A1A2A3 region of VWF with each domain expressed independently of one another and together in combination as a tri-domain. The monoclonal antibody used in this assay is found to be insensitive to the single A domains and does not recognize free A1 domains as it is often assumed. Rather, we find the assay to effectively recognize A1A2A3 with the domains together in their natural glycosylated sequence context. Furthermore, type 2M and 2B Von Willebrand Disease mutations differentially disrupt the sensitivity of the assay, indicating that mutational effects on the structure of A1 in the A1A2A3 context concomitantly disrupt the epitope of the antibody. The REAADS VWF activity assay therefore is conformationally sensitive to the native quaternary association of the A domains together and it is not specific to freely exposed A1 domains.
The REAADS Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) activity assay is currently marketed by Corgenix Medical Co, located in Broomfield, Colorado, USA. It is designed as an elegant sandwich ELISA assay in which a monoclonal murine anti-VWF antibody recognizes a functional epitope on the VWF molecule to assess VWF activity levels relative to a supplied calibrator. It is stated in the product insert that the antibody is ” specific for the portion of VWF which binds platelets.” Designed for a 96-well plate format, the REAADS VWF activity kit allows a rapid and reproducible determination of VWF activities that is presumed to be sensitive to exposure of the platelet GPIbα binding A1 domain of VWF.Footnote 1
Having recently used this assay in published [1, 2] and ongoing studies, we were interested in where the antibody actually interacts with the VWF molecule. The original 1985 publication by Goodall and colleagues states that the antibodies RFF-VIII:R/1 & 2 neutralize VWF activity to different extents [3]. In 1997, Murdock and colleagues described the epitope of RFF-VIII:R/1 [4]. It is stated that RFF-VIII:R/1”specifically recognizes the GPIbα binding domain on VWF.” However, the location of the antibody’s epitope is inferred (not directly determined) from its ability to inhibit ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination, the binding of VWF to GPIbα, and its ability to block botrocetin binding to VWF [4]. It is further stated that the antibody is conformationally specific, as it does not bind to reduced VWF [4, 5]. RFF-VIII:R/1 is also implemented in the latex particle-enhanced immunoturbidometric activity assay [6,7,8]. It is often assumed that the REAADS antibody recognizes free functional A1 domains in VWF in publications that use the turbidometric assay [6] or in assays where REAADS is used as a standard against other inhibitors, such as aptamers [9,10,11,12]. We have also previously made this assumption with respect to trauma, but noted a lack of statistical significance when REAADS is normalized to VWF:Ag [2].
Our laboratory’s focus is on the biophysical and functional characterization of the VWF A domains and on the impact of clinically relevant Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) mutations. We therefore routinely express the A domains as recombinant proteins – either as separate single A1, A2, and A3 domains or as A1A2A3 tri-domain constructs. With these tools, we questioned, “does REAADS really bind the A1 domain and report free functional A1 domains in VWF?”.
In 2020 [1], we used the REAADS assay on our A1A2A3-tri-domain (Gln1238—Gly1874) and on recombinant full-length multimeric VWF and were able to confirm the disruption of the antibody’s epitope by the type 2 VWD mutations F1369I (2 M), S1285F (2 M), V1314D (2B), and P1337L (2B). These mutations, known to misfold the A1 domain in VWF, reduced REAADS activity relative to wildtype. More recently, while exploring the use of the REAADS antibody as a conformational probe, we tested the binding of it to our bacterially-expressed A1 domain construct (Gln1238—Pro1471). To our surprise, the antibody was incapable of detecting 20 µM of the supplied protein, while it worked well on ∼ 5 µM A1A2A3.
To further investigate the binding abilities of the antibody, we tested a panel of nine recombinant protein constructs (Fig. 1), A1 (residues Gln1238—Pro1471, expressed in E.coli), A2 (residues Gly1481-Arg1668, E.coli), A3 (residues Ser1671—Gly1874, E.coli), A1 (residues Gln1238-Pro1480, HEK293 cells) and A2 (residues Pro1480—Pro1678, HEK293 cells), and A1A2A3 (residues Gln1238—Gly1874, HEK293 cells) with the afore-mentioned von Willebrand disease mutations F1369I, V1314D and P1337L. Again, the antibody was able to detect all four A1A2A3 tri-domain variants with variable activities – depending on the structural defects caused by the mutation. However, none of the single domains were detected efficiently, suggesting that the antibody does require the A1A2A3 tri-domain as the smallest recognizable unit. It does not effectively recognize separately expressed A domains unless they are supplied undiluted at very high concentrations of 10 – 20 µM. Even at these concentrations the sensitivity is substantially lower for single domains than for A1A2A3.
REAADS VWF Activity assay results for nine different recombinant A domains expressed and purified regularly in our laboratory [1, 13,14,15]. Left panel shows specific VWF REAADS activity (% Activity/µM protein). A1 and A2 were expressed in both E. coli and in HEK293 cells to account for the absence or presence of glycosylation, respectively. A3 was expressed in E. coli only as there is no reported glycosylation in A3 within VWF. A1A2A3 variants were all expressed in HEK293 cells. Note the difference in the Y-axis scale for the single A domains relative to the tri-domains. Per micromolar, the REAADS activity for single domains is less than 1, whereas for A1A2A3, the activity is 2–3 orders of magnitude greater. For protein concentrations and dilution factors used please refer to Supporting Table 1. Right panel shows reverse phase HPLC chromatograms that demonstrate the purity of our protein preparations
Our results provide direct experimental evidence that the REAADS antibody RFF VIII:R/1 is conformationally sensitive in that it does not efficiently recognize individual A domains expressed in isolation, but rather detects the three A domains together in a quaternary association. Our results, however, do not exclude the possibility that RFF VIII:R/1 recognizes domain pairs in complex, such as A1A2, A2A3, or A1A3, but prior published evidence from our studies shows that A1, A2, and A3 are thermodynamically coupled in both function and stability through quaternary structure. Comparative differential scanning calorimetry studies of A1A2A3 and the single A domain constructs show linkage in the stability of the A1, A2, and A3 domains together as a tri-domain construct and their quaternary association gets disrupted if a mutation is present in either A1 or A2 resulting in enhance platelet adhesion to the A1 domain [13, 16]. The differential loss in REAADS activity caused by the VWD variants in A1A2A3 indicates that localized structural consequences also disrupt the normal native quaternary association of the A domains. REAADS activity in VWF, therefore, is not a measure of exposure of the GPIbα-binding A1 domain, but rather a metric for the accessibility of all three A-domains in their native conformational arrangement relative to each other.
Shear stress also alters quaternary interactions. Blood flow elongates VWF multimers inducing tension in the A domains that enables GPIbα to bind to A1 at shear stresses greater than 720 dynes/cm2 [17]. Quaternary interactions between the A domains dissociated by tension would allow A1 to bind GPIbα under high shear. VWF extension is reversible [17]. Returning to stasis allows VWF multimers to relax which may restore quaternary associations of the A domains and favor the dissociation of GPIbα. In principle, binding of RFF VIII:R/1 to A1A2A3 within VWF multimers would favor relaxed conformations under stasis where the A domains have the opportunity to re-associate. Tension applied to VWF under high shear would favor a loss of recognition by RFF VIII:R/1. REAADS is performed at equilibrium under static conditions with relaxed multimers of plasma VWF. As such, in this context and the results of Figure 1, the use of the phrase “activity assay” is a misnomer; particularly since its recognition of both gain- and loss-of-function variants is reduced relative to WT.
The REAADS antibody, RFF-VIII:R/1, is used in clinical assays. The HemosIL VWF activity assay (VWF:Ab) is an automated latex particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric von Willebrand factor activity assay [6]. The same latex particle agglutination principle has also been used with GPIbα in using WT GPIbα (HemosIL VWF:RCo VWF:GPIbR) and with the G233V / M239V GPIbα double mutant (Siemens Innovance VWF:GPIbM) [18, 19]. These agglutination assays compare well with the gold standard of (VWF:RCo) activity implemented as an automated platelet agglutination assay (Siemens BC Von Willebrand reagent) [7, 20]. Comparing the manually implemented REAADS ELISA to these automated turbidometric assays reveals that REAADS underperforms with proportional error and variability resulting in some systematic bias [20, 21]. Latex HemosIL assays utilizing RFF VIII:R/1 show a reduction in VWF activity in all subclasses of type 2 VWD patients [6, 7, 22], however, Trossaert et al. did note a normal discrepancy of the Latex HemosIL assay in patients with the type 2M G1324A substitution [7], a variant known to stabilize the A1 domain [23], which could be an issue that is common for stabilizing 2M variants [24].
While RFF-VIII:R/1 performs consistently well in automated clinical assays, the REAADS ELISA re-mains a cost-effective way of determining VWF ”activity”. RFF-VIII:R/1 does not specifically report on A1 exposure, but rather on the native quaternary arrangement of all three A-domains. This circumstance is important as it should influence the interpretation of assays utilizing RFF-VIII:R/1.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Change history
09 February 2025
The supplementary file for this article has been updated to a PDF version, as the previous Word file had display issues.
Abbreviations
- VWF:
-
Von Willebrand Factor
- VWD:
-
Von Willebrand Disease
References
Tischer A, Brehm M, Machha V, Moon-Tasson L, Benson L, Nelton K, Leger R, Obser T, Martinez-Vargas M, Whitten S, Chen D, Pruthi R, Bergen H, Cruz M, Schneppenheim R, Auton M. Evidence for the misfolding of the a1 domain within multimeric von willebrand factor in type 2 von willebrand disease. J Mol Biol. 2020;432(2):305–23.
T MacArthur, J Goswami, L Moon Tasson, A Tischer, K Bailey, G Spears, J Dong, M Auton, R Kozar, M Park. Quantification of von willebrand factor and adamts-13 after traumatic injury: a pilot study. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021; 6(1): e000703.
Goodall A, Jarvis J, Chand S, Rawlings E, O’Brien D, McGraw A, Hutton R, Tuddenham E. An immunoradiometric assay for human factor VIII /von willebrand factor (VIII:VWF) using a monoclonal antibody that defines a functional epitope. Br J Haematol. 1985;59(4):565–77.
Murdock P, Woodhams B, Matthews K, Pasi K, Goodall A. von willebrand factor activity detected in a monoclonal antibody-based elisa: an alternative to the ristocetin cofactor platelet agglu-tination assay for diagnostic use. Thromb Haemost. 1997;78(4):1272–7.
Chand S, McCraw A, Hutton R, Tuddenham E, Goodall A. A two-site, monoclonal antibody-based immunoassay for von willebrand factor–demonstration that vwf function resides in a conforma-tional epitope. Thromb Haemost. 1986;55(3):318–24.
Chen D, Tange J, Meyers B, Pruthi R, Nichols W, Heit J. Validation of an automated la-tex particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric von willebrand factor activity assay. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(10):1993–2002.
M. Trossa¨ert, C. Ternisien, A. Lefrancois, L. Llopis, J. Goudemand, M. Sigaud, M. Fouassier, C. Caron. Evaluation of an automated von willebrand factor activity assay in von willebrand disease. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2011;17(6):E25–9.
Salem R, Van Cott E. A new automated screening assay for the diagnosis of von willebrand disease. Biochemistry. 2007;127(5):730–5.
Spiel A, Mayr F, Ladani N, Wagner P, Schaub R, Gilbert J, Jilma B. The aptamer arc1779 is a potent and specific inhibitor of von willebrand factor mediated ex vivo platelet function in acute myocardial infarction. Platelets. 2009;20(5):334–40.
F. Mayr, P. Kno¨bl, B. Jilma, J. Siller-Matula, P. Wagner, R. Schaub, J. Gilbert, and P. Jilma-Stohlawetz. The aptamer arc1779 blocks von willebrand factor-dependent platelet function in patients with throm-botic thrombocytopenic purpura ex vivo. Transfusion. 2010; 50(5): 1079–1087.
P. Jilma-Stohlawetz, J. Gilbert, M. Gorczyca, P. Kn¨obl, and B. Jilma, “A dose ranging phase i/ii trial of the von willebrand factor inhibiting aptamer arc1779 in patients with congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Thromb Haemost. 2011; 106(3): 539–547.
Kovacevic K, Greisenegger S, Langer A, Gelbenegger G, Buchtele N, Pabinger I, Petroczi K, Zhu S, Gilbert J, Jilma B. The aptamer bt200 blocks von willebrand factor and platelet function in blood of stroke patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):3092.
Tischer A, Moon-Tasson L, Auton M. Removal of the vicinal disulfide enhances the platelet capturing function of von willebrand factor. Blood. 2023;141(12):1469–73.
J. Campbell, A. Tischer, V. Machha, L. Moon-Tasson, B. Sankaran, C. Kim, and M. Auton. Data on the purification and crystallization of the loss-of-function von willebrand disease variant (p.gly1324ser) of the von willebrand factor a1 domain. Data Brief. 2016; 7:1700–1706.
A. Tischer, V. Machha, J. R¨osgen, and M. Auton. ““cooperative collapse” of the denatured state revealed through clausius-clapeyron analysis of protein denaturation phase diagrams. Biopolymers. 2018; 109(8): e23106.
M. Auton, K. Sowa, S. Smith, E. Sedl´ak, K. Vijayan, and M. Cruz. Destabilization of the a1 domain in von willebrand factor dissociates the a1a2a3 tri-domain and provokes spontaneous binding to glycopro-tein ibalpha and platelet activation under shear stress. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285(30): 22831–22839.
Fu H, Jiang Y, Yang D, Scheiflinger F, Wong W, Springer T. Flow-induced elongation of von willebrand factor precedes tension-dependent activation. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):324.
Higgins R, Goodwin A. Automated assays for von willebrand factor activity. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(4):496–503.
I. Bod´o, J. Eikenboom, R. Montgomery, J. Patzke, R. Schneppenheim, J. Di Paola, W. f. S. o. t. S. von, S. C. of the International Society for Thrombosis, and Haemostasis. Platelet-dependent von willebrand factor activity. nomenclature and methodology: communication from the ssc of the isth. J Thromb Haemost. 2015; 13(7): 1345–1350.
K. Friedman, M. Bo¨hm-Weigert, N. DeSimone, D. Dietzen, C. Eby, C. Flickinger, W. Hoyer, M. Kahl, K. Kottke-Marchant, T. Ortel, J. Patzke, S. Pipe, M. Stuart, A. Timur, and R. Sarode. Evaluation of an automated von willebrand factor glycoprotein ibm activity assay compared with 3 alternative von willebrand factor activity assays. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024; 8(4): 102422.
Giavarina D. Understanding bland altman analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015;25(2):141–51.
M. Pin˜ol, M. Sales, M. Costa, A. Tosetto, M. Canciani, and A. Federici, “Evaluation of a new turbidi-metric assay for von willebrand factor activity useful in the general screening of von willebrand disease.,” Haematologica. 2007; 92(5): 712–713.
Tischer A, Campbell J, Machha V, Moon-Tasson L, Benson L, Sankaran B, Kim C, Auton M. Mutational constraints on local unfolding inhibit the rheological adaptation of von willebrand factor. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(8):3848–59.
Tischer A, Moon-Tasson L, Auton M. Structure resolved dynamics of type 2m von willebrand disease. J Thromb Haemost. 2025;S1538-7836(24):00775-X. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jtha.2024.12.026.
Pace C, Vajdos F, Fee L, Grimsley G, Gray T. How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein. Biochemistry. 1995;4(11):2411–23.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Heart Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health HL146508 and by the Great Lakes Hemophilia Foundation and Health Resources and Services Administration through the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Hemophilia Treatment Center H30MC24052 to Matthew Auton.
Funding
This work was supported by National Heart Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health HL146508 and by the Great Lakes Hemophilia Foundation and Health Resources and Services Administration through the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Hemophilia Treatment Center H30MC24052 to Matthew Auton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Protein expression – LMT, AT; Protein refolding, purification & quality control – AT; REAADS Assay – LMT; data analysis – AT; wrote the paper – AT & MA.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics and consent to participate
Not applicable since this manuscript does not report on or involve any animals, humans, human data, human tissue or plants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
12959_2025_688_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary Material 1: Supporting Table 1. Protein concentrations (µM), dilution factors, microplate absorbance at 450nm, and well colors for each of the proteins in a single experiment. Four replicate experiments were done in triplicate to obtain the data presented in Figure 1. Protein µM concentrations were quantified via ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy in a Shimadzu UV-2101PC UV-Vis Scanning Spectrophotometer using the following extinction coefficients calculated from the number of tryptophans and tyrosines in the proteins and subtracting 2× the absorbance at 333 nm from the absorbance at 280 nm as described by Pace et. al. [25]: A1 (E.coli and HEK293) 15,350 L/mol/cm; A2 (E.coli and HEK293) 12,920 L/mol/cm; A3 (E.coli) 10,490 L/mol/cm; A1A2A3 (HEK293) 38,760 L/mol/cm.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tischer, A., Moon-Tasson, L. & Auton, M. The epitope of the antibody used in the REAADS VWF activity assay is quaternary. Thrombosis J 23, 3 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12959-025-00688-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12959-025-00688-x